.
.
A Greater Cincinnati Political Web Magazine Steve Fritsch - Publisher/Editor
Home   |   About Us   |   Archives   |   Contact Us   |   Facebook   |   Subscribe   |   Twitter   |   Volunteer
.
.
. Ask an Attorney: Things You Need to Know About Field Sobriety Tests
James F. Bogen
Published on December 7, 2009
.
James F. Bogen's E-mail     James F. Bogen's Bio     James F. Bogen's Archive
.
One of the things that we attorneys often hear from prospective DUI clients is the phrase. "I took the field sobriety tests but I passed them."  I want to start by making something as clear as I can:  THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS PASSING THE FIELD SOBRIETY TESTS.  A person does not "pass" the field sobriety tests simply because he does not fall over while taking them!  When these tests are administered, police officers only mark points for what the subject did wrong.  They do not give positive points for things that the subject did right.  In short, it is only possible to score negative points (or clues) on these tests.  On top of that, when I have to occasion to ask lay persons how they think these tests are scored, they can't give me a very good answer.  Imagine being required to take a test when you have not had an opportunity to learn what you will be graded on, and you have not had an opportunity to study or practice for it.  With this article I plan to shed some light on that.

There are three standardized field sobriety tests that police officers use under the guidelines of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA):  the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus test, the Walk-and-Turn test, and the One-Leg Stand test.   

Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus is an involuntary jerking of the eye that occurs naturally as the eyes gaze to the side. There are three things that police officers look for on this test:  1) Lack of smooth pursuit; 2) Distinct and sustained nystagmus (jerking) at maximum deviation (focused as far to the right or left as possible); 3) Onset of nystagmus within 45 degrees of the center of the face.  If four or more of the six possible clues appear (three possible clues for each eye), there is probable cause to arrest for DUI.

In the Walk-and-Turn test, the subject is directed to take nine steps, heel-to-toe, along a straight line. After taking the steps, the suspect must turn on one foot and return in the same manner in the opposite direction. Police officers look for eight clues on this exercise:  1) the suspect cannot keep balance while listening to the instructions; 2) begins before the instructions are finished; 3) stops while walking; 4) does not touch heel-to-toe; 5) steps off the line; 6) uses arms to balance (i.e. the subject doesn't keep them at his side); 7) makes an improper turn; or 8) takes an incorrect number of steps. Two or more of these clues are sufficient for probable cause to arrest for DUI on this test.

In the One-Leg Stand test, the subject is instructed to stand with one foot approximately six inches off the ground and count aloud by thousands (One thousand-one, one thousand-two, etc.) until told to put his foot down. The officer times the subject for 30 seconds. The officer looks for four indicators of impairment:  1) swaying while balancing; 2) using arms to balance; 3) hopping to maintain balance; and 3) putting the raised foot down.  Like the Walk-and-Turn test, two or more of these clues are sufficient for probable cause to arrest for DUI on this test.

Now, how many of you honestly thought of all of these things?  How many of you have practiced taking these tests with these exact instructions?  How many of you normally do the kinds of things that are done in these tests on a daily basis?  For those of you who are not police officers, judges, or attorneys who have litigated DUI cases, I will bet that the answer to these questions is "no."  I have administered these tests on sober people on a number of occasions, and guess what?  They all had difficulties with these tests.  And the HGN test is something I would go as far as saying is a test whose results cannot be controlled by the subject (remember, its INVOLUNTARY jerking of the eye).  In short, these are not tests that one can "pass."  Just something to think about.

James Bogen is an attorney in solo practice in Cincinnati.  Any questions or comments can be directed to him at attorneybogen@yahoo.com.
.
Subscribe to our e-mail list          Staff & Volunteers          Follow us on Twitter          Follow us on Facebook
.
.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in the above columns are those of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Cincinnatus Standard or its publisher Steve Fritsch. Furthermore, we do not expect that readers will sympathize with all the opinions and analyses they find here. However, we do offer the opportunity for those who disagree with our writers to submit their own opinions, either through letters or through opinion columns and articles. And while we will do our absolute best to offer a broad range of ideas and opinions -- some of which individuals may find to be "politically incorrect" -- The Cincinnatus Standard refuses to publish any opinion or idea that is rooted in racism or bigotry, and has the right to edit any submitted writing that blatantly distorts the historical record.